First FT: the day’s biggest stories
The most controversial and highest-leverage constraint I’ve seen is a 100-line soft cap on PRs. Review effectiveness drops off a cliff above 200-400 lines. No matter how I look at the heaps and heaps of data, smaller PRs and clear PR descriptions are the only combination that consistently moves through review at a reasonable rate. This matters doubly for AI-generated contributions. The tools will happily produce 500 lines when 60 would do, and because agentic coding generates work asynchronously, those PRs tend to pile up in the queue without the natural back-and-forth that keeps human-authored changes in scope. The moment you start treating AI-authored PRs as a separate class with different standards, the lower standard wins. Treat every review the same regardless of who or what wrote it.。新收录的资料对此有专业解读
，详情可参考新收录的资料
Синоптик Тишковец пообещал москвичам аномальное тепло07:47
地效时代来临后，他们曾在一段时间迷失过方向（零侧箱概念耽误了两年时间），但冠军之师的底蕴赋予了他们无与伦比的勇气和信念，如今，2026 近在眼前，梅奔一定可以重回前排！，详情可参考新收录的资料
Heating oil customers report prices doubling